Local business? Support local news on SaratogaCA.city

Back to Saratoga

Council to revisit annexing Mountain Winery six years after dropping the idea, as a 278-home county project waits

Two council members asked for the Nov. 18 discussion. Staff says annexation would need county LAFCO approval, a fiscal study and environmental review, and no money for it is in the budget.

Knox Abbott· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

November 14, 20263 min read

Saratoga annexation proposal - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Six years after Saratoga walked away from annexing the Mountain Winery, the City Council will talk Wednesday, Nov. 18, about whether to try again.

Two council members asked on Oct. 21 to bring the idea back, according to a staff report by Acting Community Development Director Cindy McCormick. Staff is not recommending a decision Wednesday, only asking the council what further work, if any, it wants done.

What happened last time

The city started the process in March 2019. Over the next year it held community, Planning Commission and council meetings, analyzed an environmental impact report and drafted a precise plan that would have allowed up to 300 hotel rooms alongside the existing concert venue. The staff report notes "significant opposition" from the public, and on May 20, 2020, the council voted to end the effort.

The environmental report was never certified and the plan was never adopted.

What has changed

The hillside property, in unincorporated Santa Clara County, is now the site of a builder's remedy housing application under county review. A county planner told city staff on Nov. 9 that the current proposal covers 278 homes on a 194-acre parcel: 47 detached houses, 39 triplex units, 135 market-rate multifamily units and 57 affordable multifamily units, plus an 81-room hotel, new streets and parking.

The county's environmental review is on hold for a year at the applicant's request, and a public scoping meeting is expected in late January or early February 2027, according to the report.

What annexation would take

The winery sits on two parcels. Neither is inside Saratoga's urban service area, which a property must be in before the city can annex it, and one is also outside the city's sphere of influence.

That means the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission would have to approve boundary changes first, and only the council can start that request, limited to one urban service area application a year. The filing would need environmental documents, a plan showing how water, sewer, fire and police service would be provided, and a fiscal study covering the city, county, special districts and schools.

Landowners holding more than half of the area's assessed value could block an annexation by protest. The parcel with the concert venue is prezoned residential open space, which does not allow hotels or multifamily housing by right, and the second parcel would need prezoning.

If the council wants to proceed, staff suggests first asking the landowner about its interest and planned uses, doing community outreach on costs and benefits such as hotel and property taxes and local land-use control, and possibly seeking consultant proposals. None of that is funded in the current budget, the report says.

Also on the agenda

The same meeting includes a staff recommendation to hand day-to-day management of the Saratoga Civic Theater to South Bay Musical Theatre for a $30,000 annual fee plus 18% of other groups' rental receipts, and the appeal hearing on 69 homes at 14076 Quito Road. The council meets at 7 p.m. in the Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Ave.

Sources

saratoga.granicus.com

saratoga.granicus.com

saratoga.granicus.com

Share

Knox Abbott· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Knox Abbott covers Saratoga city hall, the council, and county government.

Related Stories

More in California